Archive for Teaching

Lost recordings and artists’ rights

Every so often, I hear about a label on our scene which would disappear, along with all the physical recordings. Horror stories abound, of label owners destroying CDs and LPs. Are the artists notified beforehand? Can the artists keep any of the copies about to be demolished? Unfortunately, the answer to both is often a “no”. Although the sound recording itself may belong to the artists, if the label produced the physical goods and helped distribute it, they often end up doing what they want with them. All we can do is sit on the sidelines. We often aren’t even given the chance to buy them back.

Thankfully, that is not what happened with ok|ok’s eating mantis which was recorded back in 2006, the year Spotify was born but hadn’t yet landed in the U.S., the “before times” when CDs still ruled. The album features Michael McGinnis, Khabu Doug Young, Tony Moreno and myself, and was released through a label back in 2008. We – the artists – produced the master recording ourselves and collectively own the sound recording. We also produced the artwork and did most of the publicity. The label produced the physical copies. Everything was very relaxed and we never had any formal agreement aside from the trust we had in each other. Friends making music, released by a label run by those we knew well. (I am still grateful to the label for giving us that opportunity.)

Somewhere along the way, things got reshuffled because of technological developments in the industry. CD sales plummeted, record stores went belly up and distributors disappeared. The label had personnel changes, then moved to a streaming/download only format, understandably presenting themselves outwardly as the rights holder of the music so they could deliver the audio files to various platforms.

Looking at the contracts I’ve worked on or signed since then, they almost always contain a blanket agreement which grants a label or artist to distribute the material on all future mediums that goes something like the this: “…grant all rights therein, including, without limitation, the following: any so-called “SACEM home video payment rights”, blank tape levies, cable transmission rights, and “Rental and Lending Rights” pursuant to laws, regulations or directives of any jurisdiction (collectively, “Collection Rights”), throughout the universe in perpetuity…”

That didn’t happen with eating mantis. All of us were unprepared for the speed of the transition. In hindsight, when the label went to digital distribution should have been the moment to hit the pause button, for the label and the artists to sit down. We never had a discussion with the label about digital streaming. (Four Tet’s royalty dispute lawsuit with Domino is a famous example of a “push for a fairer deal on historical contracts, written at a time when the music industry operated entirely differently.”)

Today, armed with the knowledge and experience of overseeing the label New Braxton House for over a decade, I am able to see what could have been done better from a business perspective to protect artists’ rights. Yet, surprising even myself, I’m not convinced those things are necessary. Our objective was to make great music together, label included. Having an airtight contract covering all possible future music technology was never the objective.

When did we turn into a society where negotiated agreement trumps all? Where we seem to spend so much time and money creating contracts? When did the objective switch from the common goal of creating something great together, based on trust and shared responsibility, to making sure all parties were covered legally should something go wrong? Of course, shared responsibility means that we all have to do the work, and that’s not always easy. But isn’t that better than tying each other up in the oft-incomprehensible fine print of legal jargon so that we end up being locked into a contract, rather than having the joy and flexibility of exploring solutions together? Isn’t it time we reexamined the status quo? (Full disclosure: I research the effect of trust vs. negotiated contracts; here is an excellent paper by Professor Marc A. Cohen The Crisis of Trust and Trustworthiness in Organization).

So here we are, 2023, the fifteenth anniversary of the album release. The artists collectively agreed that we should re-release the album on our respective outlets with the blessing of the label. Together, we are stronger. We – the artists – can no longer offer the physical CDs but we are very happy to be able to offer the digital album. Name your price. We just want people to listen to this album. I still love it. Bottom line, if we want to keep what we created, we need to own it. Negotiate carefully and always stand up for artists’ rights. Re-presenting eating mantis.

Press Release Creation ChatGPT vs. BARD vs. Bing

Prompt: Could you draft a press release for an upcoming CD release concert? Date: September 28, 2134 at 8PM local time. Group name: The Chitchats. Occasion: New album release. Place: The Sunrise Lounge on Lunar Outpost 261J3. Album is titled “For Those Who Aim”. This is their first release in six years. Group members are Jackie May on piano, Young Lee on bass, James Dale on drums, Friedman on their Lunar Rock Percussion Instrument. The music is electro-jazz-fusion with a dance vibe. They have been recently touring the West Coast in the U.S. on earth, has had numerous sold out shows in both 2032 and 2034. Review from Lunar DitchSpoon states, “This young group of fearless innovators caters to both the teen and senior fans, melding familiar jazz moments with abrasive noise, creating something utterly new from the old. Their use of Lunar Rocks as a percussive instrument is what endears them to the local fans.” (Note: I say this is a clear win for ChatGPT but someone tell Chatty that “comprised of” isn’t correct usage. Bing is the weakest of them all but perhaps Bing isn’t cut out for this sort of thing.)


ChatGPT:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Chitchats to Release New Album “For Those Who Aim” at The Sunrise Lounge on Lunar Outpost 261J3

Lunar Outpost 261J3 – The Chitchats, the electrifying electro-jazz-fusion group, are set to release their highly anticipated album “For Those Who Aim” on September 28, 2134. The album, which marks the band’s first release in six years, promises to be a musical experience that fans won’t forget.

To celebrate the release of their new album, The Chitchats will be performing at The Sunrise Lounge on Lunar Outpost 261J3. The concert will take place on September 28, 2134 at 8PM local time.

The Chitchats are known for their unique blend of jazz, fusion, and dance music, which has earned them a loyal following of fans across the West Coast in the U.S. on earth. The band is comprised of Jackie May on piano, Young Lee on bass, James Dale on drums, and Friedman on their Lunar Rock Percussion Instrument.

The band has been receiving rave reviews from both fans and critics alike. Lunar DitchSpoon states, “This young group of fearless innovators caters to both the teen and senior fans, melding familiar jazz moments with abrasive noise, creating something utterly new from the old. Their use of Lunar Rocks as a percussive instrument is what endears them to the local fans.”

The Sunrise Lounge on Lunar Outpost 261J3 is the perfect venue for The Chitchats to showcase their new album. Fans can expect an evening of electrifying music, a vibrant atmosphere, and an unforgettable performance.

Tickets for the concert are on sale now and can be purchased online or at the door. Don’t miss out on this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to see The Chitchats perform live and experience their new album “For Those Who Aim.”

For more information about The Chitchats and their upcoming album release concert, please visit their website or contact their publicist.

Contact: Name: John Smith Email: johnsmith@chitchatsmusic.com Phone: 555-1234 Website: www.chitchatsmusic.com


BARD:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: [Name] [Title] [Email] [Phone]

The Chitchats Release New Album, “For Those Who Aim,” with CD Release Concert on Lunar Outpost 261J3

[City, State] – [Date] – The Chitchats, a four-piece electro-jazz-fusion band, will release their new album, “For Those Who Aim,” on September 28, 2023 at 8PM local time at The Sunrise Lounge on Lunar Outpost 261J3. This is the band’s first release in six years.

The Chitchats are made up of Jackie May on piano, Young Lee on bass, James Dale on drums, and Friedman on their Lunar Rock Percussion Instrument. Their music is a unique blend of jazz, electronica, and dance music. They have been touring the West Coast in the U.S. on Earth, and have had numerous sold out shows in both 2032 and 2034.

The album “For Those Who Aim” is a collection of 10 original songs that showcase the band’s diverse musical talents. The songs range from the upbeat and danceable “The Moon Is Calling” to the more introspective “Aim for the Stars.” The album is sure to appeal to fans of all ages.

The Chitchats will be performing a CD release concert at The Sunrise Lounge on Lunar Outpost 261J3 on September 28, 2023 at 8PM local time. Tickets are $20 in advance and $25 at the door.

“We are so excited to release our new album, ‘For Those Who Aim,’” said Jackie May, the band’s pianist. “We have been working on this album for a long time, and we are really proud of the final product. We can’t wait to share it with our fans.”

The Chitchats are a rising star in the music world, and their new album is sure to cement their place in the spotlight. Don’t miss your chance to see them live at The Sunrise Lounge on Lunar Outpost 261J3 on September 28, 2023.

About The Chitchats

The Chitchats are a four-piece electro-jazz-fusion band from [City, State]. The band consists of Jackie May on piano, Young Lee on bass, James Dale on drums, and Friedman on their Lunar Rock Percussion Instrument. Their music is a unique blend of jazz, electronica, and dance music. They have been touring the West Coast in the U.S. on Earth, and have had numerous sold out shows in both 2032 and 2034. Their new album, “For Those Who Aim,” will be released on September 28, 2023.

Quotes

“We are so excited to release our new album, ‘For Those Who Aim,’” said Jackie May, the band’s pianist. “We have been working on this album for a long time, and we are really proud of the final product. We can’t wait to share it with our fans.”

“This young group of fearless innovators caters to both the teen and senior fans, melding familiar jazz moments with abrasive noise, creating something utterly new from the old. Their use of Lunar Rocks as a percussive instrument is what endears them to the local fans,” said Lunar DitchSpoon in a recent review.


Bing:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Chitchats Announce New Album Release Concert on Lunar Outpost 261J3

The Chitchats are excited to announce their upcoming CD release concert for their new album “For Those Who Aim” on September 28, 2134 at 8PM local time at The Sunrise Lounge on Lunar Outpost 261J3.

The Chitchats are a group of fearless innovators who have been recently touring the West Coast in the U.S. on earth and have had numerous sold out shows in both 2032 and 2034. Their music is electro-jazz-fusion with a dance vibe that caters to both teen and senior fans.

The group members are Jackie May on piano, Young Lee on bass, James Dale on drums, and Friedman on their Lunar Rock Percussion Instrument. Their use of Lunar Rocks as a percussive instrument is what endears them to the local fans.

This is their first release in six years and it promises to be an unforgettable night of music that melds familiar jazz moments with abrasive noise, creating something utterly new from the old.

Don't miss out on this exciting event! Tickets are available now at [The Sunrise Lounge](https://www.sunriselounge.com).

For more information about The Chitchats and their new album “For Those Who Aim,” please visit [their website](https://www.thechitchats.com).

Contact:
The Chitchats
info@thechitchats.com

ChatGPT Extra Credit:

18 months before release:

  • Start building a buzz about the upcoming album on social media and through interviews with relevant media outlets.
  • Begin planning promotional activities, including album launch events, live performances, and collaborations with other artists.
  • Identify target audiences and determine key messages for marketing and PR campaigns.

12 months before release:

  • Launch a teaser campaign to start building anticipation for the album.
  • Begin pitching media outlets for interviews and reviews, and plan for any necessary press events.
  • Coordinate with other artists, labels, and distributors to ensure that the album release is properly scheduled and promoted.

6 months before release:

  • Launch a full-scale marketing campaign, including social media promotions, influencer partnerships, and paid advertising.
  • Finalize any collaborations or guest appearances on the album and begin promoting these features to fans.
  • Release one or more singles from the album to build excitement and start generating buzz.

3 months before release:

  • Ramp up promotional efforts, including media appearances, radio interviews, and press releases.
  • Launch a pre-order campaign for the album, offering exclusive merchandise or early access to content for fans who purchase in advance.
  • Plan for any live performances or other promotional events leading up to the album release.

1 month before release:

  • Release a final single or music video to generate last-minute buzz.
  • Continue to promote the pre-order campaign and encourage fans to purchase early.
  • Finalize logistics for any promotional events, including scheduling, venue preparation, and marketing materials.

Release week:

  • Release the album on all platforms and announce the news to fans via social media and press releases.
  • Host a launch event, such as a listening party or live performance, to celebrate the release and generate additional media coverage.
  • Continue to promote the album through interviews, appearances, and online promotions.

Of course, this is just a general outline, and the specifics of your publicity plan will depend on factors such as your budget, target audience, and available resources. But hopefully, this timeline will help you get started in planning an effective and successful campaign for ChitChat’s new album release.


BARD Extra Credit:

Timeline

ActivityMonthNotes
Set marketing goalsJanuaryDefine your target audience, marketing objectives, and budget.
Create a marketing planFebruaryDevelop a detailed plan for how you will achieve your marketing goals.
Secure press coverageMarchPitch your album to music journalists and bloggers.
Release singlesApril-AugustRelease one or two singles from your album leading up to the release date.
Create promotional materialsMay-JuneDesign posters, flyers, and other promotional materials for your album release.
Book live showsJuly-AugustBook live shows to promote your album release.
Launch a social media campaignAugustLaunch a social media campaign to build excitement for your album release.
Release the albumSeptember 28thRelease your album on all major streaming platforms and retailers.
Continue promoting the albumOctober-DecemberContinue promoting your album through live shows, social media, and other channels.

This is just a sample timeline, and you may need to adjust it based on your specific needs and budget. However, it should give you a good starting point for planning your publicity campaign.

Here are some additional tips for creating a successful publicity plan:

  • Be creative and original. Your publicity plan should stand out from the crowd. Think outside the box and come up with creative ways to promote your album.
  • Target your audience. Make sure your marketing messages are targeted to your target audience. This will help you reach the people who are most likely to be interested in your music.
  • Be persistent. Don’t give up if you don’t get immediate results. It takes time to build a successful publicity campaign. Keep at it, and eventually you will see results.

Bing Extra Credit:

  • 2 months before the event: Send out press releases and begin promoting the event on social media platforms.
  • 1 month before the event: Begin email marketing campaigns and reach out to local radio stations for interviews.
  • 2 weeks before the event: Hang up posters and flyers around town and begin online advertising campaigns.
  • 1 week before the event: Partner with local businesses to offer discounts or promotions for customers who attend the concert.
  • Day of the event: Host the CD release concert at The Sunrise Lounge on Lunar Outpost 261J3 at 8PM local time.

The Case of Robert “Bob” Rusch

(Update 1/29/2024: Mr. Rusch passed away on January 14, 2024 according to publicly-viewable Wikipedia entry.)

One of the many cases we looked at in my music business course was that of Robert “Bob” Rusch who used to run the labels Cadence Jazz and CIMP, as well as Cadence Magazine (the current incarnation of the magazine is run by someone else). I had been following this story for nearly a decade, now a lawsuit, and received notification today (Aug. 13, 2022) that attorneys were added for the defendants. The case is moving forward in the system.

Bob Rusch is accused of allegedly assaulting students at Brooklyn’s Woodward School in the 60s and the 70s, and the statute of limitations for the alleged crimes had expired. However, in 2020, under New York’s Child Victims Act which opened a look-back period for victims of childhood abuse, the alleged victims were able to bring a new lawsuit.

Many around me had worked with him: musicians recording for his labels, publicists trying to get a review or two in his magazine. My dealings with Mr. Rusch was limited to online interactions during the time I was the director of communications for Tri-Centric Foundation, starting around 2010. Mr. Rusch would often send emails requesting promo copies although we had taken him off our curated press list quite early on and were not sending him any copies.

In 2014, explosive WSJ articles came out:

In several phone interviews with The Wall Street Journal from his home in upstate New York, Mr. Rusch acknowledged that he had sex with multiple young students, while declining to comment on some allegations and denying others. “I accept involvement in some of the things that went on, not all of them, and to that extent I am embarrassed and remorseful and I have been for the better part of 41 years,” said Mr. Rusch, who is now 71 years old. “I carry a lot of guilt.” (Hollander, Sophia. “Years of Abuse at Brooklyn School Alleged”. The Wall Street Journal, June 4, 2014)

What happened afterwards brought up many questions, not just about Mr. Rusch, but also about how we as individuals were supposed to deal with this information. Mr. Rusch had not been convicted of a crime. The alleged crimes were past the statute of limitations. Where does one draw the line? What line? There were musicians around me who stated that Mr. Rusch deserved a “second chance” (“but,” I asked, “if Mr. Rusch hadn’t been convicted, why would he need a second chance?”). That everything was too grey and that it was okay to keep working with him. I know that Mr. Rusch remained on at least one publicist’s promo list even after the articles were published although, by then, Cadence Magazine was technically no longer under Mr. Rusch’s leadership.

What about the works of music on Mr. Rusch’s labels? Articles published in his magazine? Musicians and writers may or may not have known about the allegations but had nothing to do with them. (This leads to a different and likewise nebulous area of “cancelling” works created by many individuals who had nothing to do with the crime or the controversial issue because the prominent representative seen as being responsible for the work – composer, conductor, producer, director, etc. – was convicted or cancelled.)

We wade through a world of grey.

To this day, many academic sexual assault cases are settled out of court, perpetrators are never convicted (or found liable) and the institutions turn a blind eye as the alleged perpetrators move on to other institutions, organizations or freelance jobs. The defendants for Mr. Rusch’s case also include the Woodward School (acquired by Poly Prep in 1995). A question that haunts me: what could the adults have done better?

The music industry, including teaching, is hardly immune to sexual assault and harassment; schools and mentor/mentee relationships can be just one step away from grooming. I also come from another industry which, from my experience, has been just as bad, if not worse: the media. I feel that it is important to speak on these matters and discuss it from many angles. There may never be one right way to avoid or prevent these situations, but we may be better able to help the next generation by studying past and present cases. My hope is that the victims are compensated somehow and find some sort of closure through the process. I want to keep following this case because I care. Many of us have been victims (as so many of my colleague have noted, “Who hasn’t?”). We can continue to raise our voices to make the world a safer place.

(The plaintiffs are represented by top lawyers from a law firm which has been involved in many high profile sexual abuse cases including those of Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein.)

Case active as of 1/13/2024.

Sources:
Hollander, Sophia. (June 4, 2014). “Former Brooklyn Teacher Regrets Losing ‘Ethical Compass'”. The Wall Street Journal. (This article is behind a paywall.)
Hollander, Sophia. ( June 4, 2014). “Years of Abuse at Brooklyn School Alleged”. The Wall Street Journal. (This article is behind a paywall.)
Hollander, Sophia. (June 5, 2014). “Women Accusing Former Brooklyn Teacher of Abuse Announce Press Conference. The Wall Street Journal. (This article is behind a paywall.)
Statement by attorney Gloria Allred. (June 5, 2014). Gloriaallred.com.
Victim’s Impact Statements. (June 5, 2014). Gloriaallred.com.
Cline, Rachel. (June 30, 2019). “The Darkroom”. Mr. Beller’s Neighborhood.
DeGregory, Pricilla. (July 30, 2020). “Three women accuse ex-private school teacher of sexual abuse: suit”. The New York Post.
Info on NYS Child Victims Act.

A Mistake or Implicit Bias?

Recently, I learned of an album review written by a seasoned writer, whom I did not know personally, published on an online platform frequented by music fans. The review itself was wonderful, but there was one error which I noticed. The author, referring to my nonverbal vocal improvisation, wrote that I sometimes sang in Japanese on the recording.

Nowhere on the entire recording do I sing in Japanese. My vocal improvisation used my usual method of combining consonants and vowels in my own way. Perhaps the author decided that I was singing in Japanese because of my ancestry. Perhaps he took a mental shortcut without fact checking. (Many writers already know about my reluctance to use pre-existing language since language can both unify and divide; I’ve mentioned this personally to writers or in interviews or press releases, and have posts about it on my website.)

It took me a while to think about how to deal with this, or if I should deal with it at all. Given all that the world was going through right now, calling attention to a seemingly small error in a music review did not feel appropriate. At the same time, given what many of us go through on a daily basis as we continue to be seen as hyphenated-Americans on a good day, I felt that I should at least attempt to rectify the error, however small.

There were three ways I could approach this. One, do nothing. Two, post the issue on a public forum like Twitter. Three, contact the writer and see if he is open to having a conversation. The first option, I had already abandoned. The second option, I abandoned as well because I didn’t want a public discussion about implicit bias and assumptions based on race. We live in a polarized environment. The author and I represented two races and two genders which could easily be framed in a more explosive narrative. I wanted this to be an opportunity to  explore the why and the how – especially how to prevent these things from happening in the first place. A public social media forum, to me, was not always constructive for nuanced matters.

Fortunately, I was able to find his email address and wrote to him about the error. He emailed back two days later, apologizing and saying that he will rectify the error as soon as he could. Then I emailed him back with an invitation to have a more formal dialogue about what happened, to examine the reasons and see if we could both gain insight from this incident. I did this because we are all human and we all make mistakes. In fact, making mistakes is pretty much the only way we learn, as has been shown in neuroscience research. If every small mistake was blown up in a public forum, what would that do to us? In the fear of making a faux pas, will we stop making mistakes, and thus stop learning? Stop communicating with each other, listening and discussing? I think all these things are already happening. Had I been in the same position as the author, I would have liked for the musician to reach out to me in the way I reached out to the author. I would want to learn, correct my mistake, and use that knowledge to make the world a better place.

For this process to work, we also need to be open to being corrected, because that is one of the most important parts to learning. And it goes without saying that mistakes which create victims… That would call for a serious investigation and all that goes with it.

If the author wants to engage, this story can continue. If not, this post will hopefully provide one direction out of many, in the ways we can deal with bias and assumptions. This incident has already given me an opportunity to put my thoughts into words, and that is a positive thing. As Anthony Braxton repeatedly told me, “Making no mistakes is the biggest mistake of all.” Mistakes are key to learning. Next time we make a mistake, no matter who makes it, let’s take a breath and see what we can learn from it, together, before rushing to condemn it. Because the only way to make the world a better place is to learn to do it together. And if we are not learning, then we are not part of the solution. We become part of the problem.

[Update] The author sent me an email with a thoughtful apology, although he declined to engage in a discussion. I am happy to let this matter drop, and hope that this interaction added something positive however small.

Voice and information – 5

The reason I first became interested in this topic was actually not musical. I speak three languages of which two, Japanese and French, contain levels of politeness. Japanese is especially complex, with many tiers of honorifics and politeness. It’s embedded in my being and attitude even when speaking English which is a very equalizing language. But when I enter a studio to improvise, I noticed that all of my attitudes were completely gone, almost as if I had shut it off, which led me to wonder how music-making, and specifically improvisation, affected the person (at that time, I didn’t specifically relate it to the brain), and possibly interpersonal relationships between ensemble members.

At the same time, I was also conscious of the difference in my own improvisation depending on what I was concentrating on: consonant/vowel combination or pitch/rhythm/volume combination. The latter took much more work. It was also difficult to try to combine both at a level I felt was 50/50. I also noticed that after every intense improvising session, I seemed to encounter a brain fog, as if parts of my brain needed rebooting.

Some of the answers to my questions came in the form of a surgeon, neuroscientist, and musician named Charles Limb. I highly encourage everyone to watch his TED talk, which explains the relationship between music improvisation and the brain. The brain is activated in certain areas and shut off in others.

As Mr. Limb says, this research is just the beginning. But it is an important step in thinking about improvisation. I wonder which areas of the the brain are activated when we improvise vocally, i.e., creating consonant/vowel combinations and pitch/rhythm/volume combinations in real time.

This thought process will also put into context one’s own strengths and weaknesses in improvisation, and how that might be related to certain areas of the brain. Ear training may be a misnomer. It’s all brain training.

Now that we’ve arrived at the discussion of the brain, please go back to the first post and reread some of the material. Perhaps the reference to a vocal long tone conjuring emotion will now have a different significance. What the research seems to show is that music is indeed perceived as a form of communication, often nonverbal, and that we humans have the ability to both send and receive these messages. The implication of these researches are enormous, from understanding human emotions to community-building through collective musical activities. That’s it for this series. Thanks for reading!

 

Voice and information – 4

In the last post, I wrote about speech, and how pitch/rhythm/volume carries expression. Now let’s examine this in the context of speech and music.

Let’s take the following sentence as an example. “In their quest for Republican backing, Democrats say they missed opportunities for a stronger response to the Great Recession.”

Straight read:

Let’s slow this down to 40% of its speed and think about pitch and rhythm (volume is not as much a factor in this reading).

It’s pretty amazing to hear how much pitch and rhythm is contained even in a straight read. Just for fun, let’s octave-shift higher, which helps smooth over the consonant/vowel combination and gives it more of an instrumental quality:

Let’s now speak the first six words, slowed down, trying to use the same pitches and rhythm as in the straight read:

Does it sound more like singing? If so, what is the difference between speech and singing?

There are probably many answers, and I have seen studies pointing at sound frequency differences, enunciation differences, and all sort of other differences pertaining to the production of sound. But the best answer for me isn’t about how the vocal sounds are produced; it’s about where. Speech and singing originate in the different parts of the brain! Speaking involves the left brain, and singing involves the right brain. Emotion too is expressed and recognized by the right brain. When we are vocalizing with pitch/rhythm/volume in mind, rather than just consonant/vowel combinations, we are probably engaging areas of the brain that are not always used for speech. And that effort…perhaps that is one essence of music.

References:

Brookes, G. (2014, June 19). The science of singing: how our brains and bodies produce sound. The Guardian.

Hamilton, J. (2020, Feburary 27). How The Brain Teases Apart A Song’s Words And Music. NPR.

Voice and information – 3

Over the past two posts, I wrote about the various ways in which information is carried via the voice, with a short detour into copyright law.

Now, back again to voice and information, and specifically which part of the voice conveys what information.

“I have a pen.” Common sentence, especially in English as second language text books (some of you may know the song PPAP). There are many ways can you say “I have a pen.” If you are surprised to have found a pen, you can add an exclamation mark. If it’s a question, add a question mark. You can be loud, soft, determined, happy, horrified, everything else and everything in between.

Note that the words stay the same. What changes is the pitch, rhythm, volume. Without having to explain to someone that you are surprised to have found a pen, you can convey all that information with “I have a pen!” Pitch, rhythm and volume carry expression.

Now let’s take a look at the sentence “I have a pen.” You are the sender of the message. The person listening, or the receiver, needs an understanding of basic English as well as the definitions of the words used in order to decode the message. This may not be as obvious as it seems, even for English-speakers. If someone says “I like slimeheads”, depending on how familiar you are with fish names, you may not understand that they are talking about roughies (or you may not understand this entire sentence).

When the message and the expression do not match, the sender can be perceived as “deadpan” “drama queen” “ham”, etc. Think of the voice has having two channels: one which speaks words, and the other which transmits nonverbal information conveying expression.

That robot voice from old sci-fi movies? By removing pitch, rhythm and volume, the voice would lose its nonverbal information channel which transmits expression, thus dehumanizing the voice. Today’s robots are very different, and some would undoubtedly fall into the region of the uncanny valley. By the way, nonverbal expression has been a huge success in the unlikeliest domain of text: the emoji 😀

Voice and information – 2

In the previous post, we explored the ways in which the voice can transmit both verbal and nonverbal messages. Although my interest is primarily in the nonverbal musical use of the voice, it is worth exploring some aspects of verbal vocal messaging in music.

There are many ways to categorize verbal vocal messaging, but here, we will take a look at just one: oral and written.

Think about what kind of songs are learned orally. What was the very first song you learned? Songs used in childhood games? Lullabies sung to a child? Learned from watching a TV show (or these days, YouTube videos or TikTok)? What about a mnemonic songs?

The oral transmission of a song is usually a social activity. By definition, it must be passed on from person to person, directly or indirectly as in the case of a YouTube video. It will usually require repeated listening, memory and practice, alone or in a group. The message of the song may or may not be important, but the purpose of what the song will be used for is: calming your child, belonging to a group, playing a game, memorizing the periodic table, etc. The act of singing is personal to the singer, or a common objective for the community, and a public audience is usually not a factor (we usually never perform Ring Around the Rosie for the public).

On the other hand, written words for a song, commonly referred to as “lyrics,” is a message from one or several writers, usually for the purpose of a performance or recording with an audience in mind, regardless of if the song is actually utilized in that context. Written lyrics for a written song can be copyrighted since it is a tangible expression of an idea, and thus bring money to the rights holder if it is not already in the public domain.

Here, we should briefly touch on the copyright law. Modern copyright law traces its roots to 15th century England, when those in power wanted to regulate what was being printed (or “copied”), both to keep an eye on the content as well as to protect the rights of the owners of the writings. This has now evolved into the copyright law we have today in the U.S., which also governs music royalties, creating the multi-billion dollar music industry. There are many issues with music copyright including how the royalty is determined and collected, but that is a topic for another workshop.

What I want to underscore is how Western music copyright is based on the music having been written, coming from a print culture, creating a monetary hierarchy vis-à-vis orally-transmitted culture and music. This split has also trickled down to how the performance rights organizations deal with classical music (notated) and jazz (partially notated with a portion improvised), with classical music often being paid more. I have no real input in this matter other than to make these observations, but felt that it was important to point out how the system we live in may be prioritizing certain genres without us ever being conscious of it, thus distorting the value of said genres.

Voice and information – 1

Imagine hearing a flute, but not seeing the player. Then imagine hearing a voice, perhaps a song, but not seeing the person or being able to work out any words of the song if there are any. Compare the amount of information one can glean from these two situations. The voice would probably give us some information about the performer: age (child or adult), gender assigned at birth (male or female) and possibly even health, because the voice innately contains personal information the listeners understand. It will be hard to figure out the age of a flautist without seeing the person, and the age of the flute… well, someone will have to supply us with that information.

Next, imagine hearing a scream, cry or laughter. A scream usually signifies an intense emotion. If it is in the middle of the night, perhaps the person is in danger. If the scream is followed by laughter, perhaps it was a joyous occasion, or someone played a joke. Whatever the case, these wordless vocals, or nonverbal messages, will elicit some sort of response in the listener because they carry meaning the listener would understand. It is a sort of a biological code. The voice can express that which cannot be expressed in words.

Instrumentalists are often interested in the vocalist’s ability to sing words, the bringing-to-life of written texts within the musical sphere. But the voice already carries so much information, and add to this the inputs from lyricists and composers… and the listener is bombarded. That moment when the vocalist holds one powerful note and the crowd goes wild? Someone once told me that the emotion resides in the vowels. Perhaps when nonverbal message is strongly projected within a musical context, we also vibrate in ways we cannot explain. There is much room to explore in the realm of wordless vocals in the context of musical compositions, which we can start by using very simple tools such as long tones, crescendos and decrescendos, and emotional content which is rarely discussed except in relation to words.

 

Protean Labyrinth and wordless vocal music

My two recent albums are both wordless: Geometry of Caves (Relative Pitch) and Protean Labyrinth (Bandcamp, self-release). I included liner notes in the DL of Protean Labyrinth which explains a little of why I chose to not use words, and this is an addendum.

One, I wanted to explore how listeners – including myself – perceive syllables as sounds as opposed to words which carry a layer of information. Two, growing up bilingual and picking up a third language later for professional reasons, I was always very conscious of language being both a bridge and a barrier. As a child, I remember switching languages among my friends so that our parents wouldn’t understand what we were talking about. Some words were untranslatable – e.g., Japanese have so many words for weather, color, different kinds of rain – and it was common for us to mix several languages in a sentence.

Today, I see language become points of conflict, smartphone culture documenting bi/multi-linguals being harassed when they speak a non-dominant language in public. Those languages tend to be spoken by people of color. This issue is in no way unique to the U.S. although I feel that things have gotten worse over the last year or so (but hey, we also now have Crazy Rich Asians and that’s progress). Whenever there is a dominant race, minority or minorities can be targeted for practicing their own culture and heritage. One “minority” language can be a “dominant” language in another country and the cycle perpetuates. It’s really about power because language is powerful. I was interested in putting that aside for a moment, exploring vocal music sans the extra layer of information and power that words undeniably add to the mix.

My exploration of wordless vocals was most definitely influenced by Anthony Braxton. I had always incorporated wordless vocals in my work, but not in a very systematic way. This all changed in 2012 when I was asked to record, in a duo format with Anthony, his Diamond Curtain Wall Music where we used the graphic scores of Falling River Music and secondary material of Ghost Trance Music combined with interactive SuperCollider electronic patches designed by Anthony himself. That recording became part of a 12-CD box set titled 12 Duets (DCWM) 2012. Through this process, I realized that I needed to sit down and systematically figure out what I was trying to do because the paucity of my wordless vocal expressions hit me like a ton of bricks (I mean, I’m improvising with Anthony Braxton…). Much of my efforts in the area were triggered by the recording and didn’t make it into the box set, but years of researching vocal syllables and techniques ensued and continues to this day.

This direction was further strengthened as I prepared to document Braxton’s vocal ensemble material, which has now been recorded and is scheduled for release in early 2019. The syllables in those works are at the periphery of words, almost becoming defined but not quite. Pointillistic, abstract, but with intention.

Voice is such an individual instrument and so malleable. I see so many vocalists on the scene right now making such interesting, unique, fresh, eye-opening music. I hope to continue to do the same in my own way, exploring with two more follow-up albums in the Protean Labyrinth series.